Thursday, November 29, 2012

From Multiply 082: In a Pensive Mood...


After more than two weeks of vacation, I find myself in dire need of some physical exercise. To be confined to a monotonous routine of working and sleeping is the worst form of torture there is. Okay, I did have the much-needed opportunity to read more books for my thesis but knowing that it's for the completion of that much-dreaded thesis work got me all pressured with note-taking on the side and making sure I understand the texts that my eyes follow. Such tedious work, really. But it will be a great exercise for me, an Iska, who will one day tread the path of a researcher. Never mind that my thesis project is not in any way connected to the Philippines per se, but I'm sure it'll be useful in the future, I hope.

The whole Christmas break had been a depressing one for me, with lots of inner conflicts stirring my mind into turbulence. It was supposed to be a season to rejoice, to forget one's worries, to spread love... But hey, what love? I've grown cold, indifferent, apathetic, remorseful. To confess, I have this almost insane desire to annihilate everything. Were I Kali, that war goddess clothed in blood, or Shiva, her husband, I could have easily brought about the destruction of the world. For what reasons, you ask? For the very reason that man has become wiser in his own eyes and strays from the wisdom, seeking to make life better but only making it miserable in the process. The world has become a living hell, the product of man's incessant abuses and foolishness.

I long for the mountains and the beaches I have visited in the past. I long for the squishy mud, the sudden cold and the eventual warmth I would feel after burying my feet under it. I long for the cool soft earth, the smell of the earth that gives me a renewed sense of being. I hate all the cemented ground. The whole stretch of EDSA, Quezon Avenue, major roads, and now even narrow ones. Why pave all with cement? When the hot glaring sun is out, we all suffer as if we were being baked inside an oven. To not be with nature indeed is bad, but to be with insensible creatures is even worse; it is hell.

I remember when I was a freshie, I loved walking from Kalay to the archery range during the months of January and February. Back then, the weather was cool and refreshing, with the sweet smell of plants perfuming the atmosphere. One big bonus is the presence of clouds which shield me (okay, us) from the hateful rays of the sun. Truly a delight to go for a walk, especially with occasional falling leaves--- the perfect way to fall in love. (But as you all know, dear readers, yours truly is unfortunately single.) And fall in love I did, with nature, naturally! (Now who needs a boyfriend? =P )

But now, it's all so different. I have to walk a long mile under the hot hot, ULTRA hot sun. Damn it! No cool winds to soothe my burning skin. No friendly clouds to block the sun. And no sweet rain with the smell of sweet earth, to accompany me in this cursed world. This really is the RED DUST, a place of torment, where every pleasure is mere illusion. Where is my paradise???

And yet here I am, thrown into this unregenerate world, forced to mingle with fellow humans, if they really ARE human beings. Methinks they are monsters with human flesh and human appearance. I have surely become a misanthrope. Or raher, I reverted back to being a misanthrope, the me before I started high school. It disgusts me now to even think that I changed into someone who LOVES people when I was in HS which lasted until the end of my freshman year in college. Now I'm just cynical, pessimistic, apathetic even. I can't help it. I want to get away from civilization, do as Thoreau did, do what Rousseau dreamed. But where? Where to start life anew? Seems like pretty much everything's been contaminated with the filth of lowly creatures who call themselves human beings. Myself included in this pathetic tirade.

So much as I would have liked to say that everything's back to normal (meaning I'm a student again which I love being), I will have to refuse to say so. I'm back to school, back to my beloved library with its collection of old dusty books, back to reading lots, back to the best learning environment (IMO), back to sleepless nights, back to meeting demands, back to wakinng up early in the morning... Yes, I'm back to normal. BUt I have to alienate myself from my environment for it has certainly become NOT normal.

Jan 5, '10 10:34 AM
for Miracle's friends, Miracle's family and Miracle's online buddies

From Multiply 081: The Carlos Aureus Reading List


Got this list from http://aiscracker.com/?p=1485

I was searching the net for information concerning my beloved Prof. Aureus and I found this. It seems his taste tends to difficult reads, seeing here many historical, philosophical and scientific books, as well as novels that require an encyclopedic knowledge. I wonder if he has read any of Umberto Eco's books. (I am a big Eco fan and I'm surprised no work of his is included in the list.) I also notice that he missed out some of my fave writers like Dickens, Twain, Alcott, Soseki and Mishima. As usual, the dominant elements are Anglo-American with a few Filipino novels included though the absence of F. Sionil Jose is somewhat of a shock. (I haven't read any of his works but I know a European who has done so and he's pretty much impressed, even telling me that he can be considered for the Nobel Prize for Literature.)

I also question the inclusion of Hemingway. Really! With his boring realism and dull, oh-so-common prose??? He did reinvent the way a novel should be, something that can be read by everybody, but I just find that so boring.

Going through the list, I lament that the only Jew I find is Einstein. (Okay, I'm obsessed with the Jews, just that they're so admirable in their forbearance.) And why is it that there are no Muslim writers? Basho's haiku and the Tang Dynasty poets are nowhere in the list. Not even Rig Veda nor the Kama Sutra. (And I'm so tempted to add "The Perfumed Garden".) And no Japanese writer! What happens to the four GREAT literary works of China, one of which is "The Dream of Red Mansions", a great favorite of mine???

Still, it's interesting to know his literary tastes. I really should start reading "Canterbury Tales", "Divine Comedy" (I'll see if I can find a nice translated version), "Paradise Lost" and "Paradise Regained", the Dostoevsky novels (I hear they're great reads) and "In Search of Lost Time" (aka Remembrance of Things Past of which, after leafing through a few pages, I have the impression it can cure me of my insomnia LOL! But his prose is very beautiful, at times even lyrical.)

Highlighted works are what I've finished reading. Just note the difference in our taste. (I tend to go for extremely tragic and/or erotic novels. XD )
1. The King James Bible (or the Holy Koran)
2. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare
3. The Surangama Sutra of Buddhism
4. Homer: The Iliad and The Odyssey
5. Virgil: The Aeneid
6. Cervantes: Don Quixote
7. Dante: The Divine Comedy (Three Parts)
8. Sophocles: The Oedipus Trilogy
9. The Bhagavad Gita (also read the Mahabharata and the Ramayana)
10. Goethe: Faust (Parts One and Two)
11. Plato: The Republic
12. Aristotle: Poetics
13. Lao Tse: Tao Te Ching
14. Saint Augustine: Confessions (also read The City of God)
15. Saint Thomas Aquinas: Summa Theologica
16. Chaucer: Canterbury Tales
17. John Milton: Paradise Lost
18. Malory: Le Morte D’Arthur
19. John Bunyan: Pilgrim’s Progress
20. Jonathan Swift: Gulliver’s Travels
21. Herman Melville: Moby Dick
22. James Joyce: A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
23. James Joyce: Dubliners
24. James Joyce: Ulysses
25. William Faulkner: The Sound and the Fury (also read As I Lay Dying)
26. Ernest Hemingway: For Whom the Bell Tolls (also read The Sun Also Rises)
27. Saint Thomas More: Utopia
28. Henry David Thoreau: Walden (also read Civil Disobedience)
29. Walt Whitman: Leaves of Grass
30. T.S. Eliot: The Waste Land (also read Tradition and the Individual Talent)
31. John Henry Cardinal Newman: Apologia Pro Vita Sua (also read The Idea of a University)
32. Joseph Conrad: Heart of Darkness (also read Lord Jim)
33. Beowulf
34. Pearl: Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
35. The Venerable Bede: The Ecclesiastical History of the English People
36. Karl Marx: Das Kapital
37. W. B. Yeats: A Vision
38. W. B. Yeats: Collected Poems
39. George Bernard Shaw: Pygmalion
40. Bernard Lonergan: Insights
41. Nietzsche: Thus Spake Zarathustra
42. Manu: The Laws of Manu
43. Stephen Hawking: A Brief History of Time
44. Joseph Campbell: The Power of Myth
45. Harold Bloom: The Western Canon
46. James Hilton: Goodbye, Mr. Chips
47. James Hilton: Lost Horizon
48. Oswald Spengler: The Decline of the West
49. Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan
50. T. H. White: The Once and Future King
51. Jean Jacques Rosseau: Confessions (also read The Social Contract)
52. Flaubert: Madame Bovary
53. Victor Hugo: Les Miserables
54. James Frazer: The Golden Bough
55. Ovid: Metamorphosis
56. Dostoevsky: The Brothers Karamazov
57. Dostoevsky: Crime and Punishment
58. Thomas Mann: The Magic Mountain
59. Jose Rizal: Noli Me Tangere
60. Jose Rizal: El Filibusterismo
61. Albert Camus: The Plague
62. Jean Paul Sartre: Being and Nothingness (also read In Camera)
63. Franz Kafka: The Trial
64. Boetius: The Consolation of Philosophy
65. Honore de Balzac: The Human Comedy
66. Proust: Remembrance of Things Past
67. Jacques Derrida: Of Grammatology
68. Teilhard de Chardin: The Phenomenon of Man
69. Teilhard de Chardin: The Future of Man
70. Sir Isaac Newton: Principia Mathematica
71. Gilbert Highet: The Classical Tradition
72. Gibbon: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
73. Marquez: One Hundred Years of Solitude
74. Ferdinand de Saussure: Course in General Linguistics
75. Foucault: Discipline and Punishment
76. Roland Barthes: Image Music Text
77. Walter Benjamin: Illuminations
78. Anton Chekhov: The Duel
79. Nick Joaquin: Prose and Poems
80. Gregorio Brillantes: The Distance to Andromeda and Other Stories
81. Confucius: The Analects
82. B. F. Skinner: Small Is Beautiful
83. The Tibetan Book of the Dead
84. Sigmund Freud: The Interpretation of Dreams
85. John Fowles: The Magus
86. Susan Brownmiller: Against Our Will
87. J. D. Salinger: The Catcher in the Rye
88. B. F. Skinner: Beyond Freedom and Dignity
89. Ezra Pound: Cantos
90. William Golding: Lord of the Flies
91. Will and Ariel Durant: The Story of Philosophy
92. Marshall McLuhan: The Medium is the Message
93. Edith Hamilton: Mythology (also read The Roman Way)
94. Albert Einstein: Relativity, the Special and General Theories
95. Nicolaus Copernicus: De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium
96. Charles Darwin: Origin of Species
97. Documents of Vatican 11
98. Thomas Malthus: Essay on the Principle of Population
99. Rachel Carson: Silent Spring
100.Martin Heidegger: Being and Time


Dec 27, '09 10:38 AM
for Miracle's friends, Miracle's family and Miracle's online buddies

From Multiply 080: Xmas


This time of the year, Christmas greetings abound. It sure gives a warm feeling having been wished a Merry Christmas even though to some, those are just empty words said to others for the sake of that damned formality. Still, I trust that those who do wish me a Merry Christmas wish me well and from the heart.

To be frank though, I am greatly bothered by the greeting "Merry Xmas". In high school mathematics, x is probably the most popular variable. Remember "let x be any number from blah blah to blah..."? X then can be any number. Why use x instead of Christ? Where does Christ figure in His supposedly special day?

Since I have been reading a lot about mythology since my childhood days, I know that some scholars believe that the story of Jesus Christ is derived from the cult of Mithra, the sun god who himself died and was resurrected. Just happens that his birthdate is December 25. We know that the Catholic church incorporated many pagan stuffs into its system and this is one of it. (I have read somewhere that the true birthdate of Christ is around September. But it's just a speculation, and no real evidence has been established yet.)

But this I argue: as Christians, we believe in Christ. Otherwise we are not called as such. You may be a Catholic but bear in mind that Catholicism started from Christianity. Catholics believe in Christ, do they not? So if you believe in Christ, it follows that He is important in your life. Therefore, on His special day, one shouldn't replace His name with the variable X.

Next year, I hope to receive decent Christmas wishes, with Christ's name fully spelled out. If you're not a Christian, well, it's understandable if you don't use Christmas, but to make it sound better, just say "Happy Holidays".

Dec 24, '09 10:08 PM
for everyone

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

From Multiply 079: Christmas 2009


This is probably the worst Christmas ever.

It's my second time to complete the Simbang Gabi but inside of me, I feel empty and cold. No, it's not because of the weather. It's just that something's missing in my life and I can't pinpoint exactly what it is.

And so I spend this year's first few hours of Christmas day in front of my laptop, downloading Yiruma's albums while playing some of his compositions. Then I suddenly remembered that I need a little shoujo magic so I went on to read manga (thanks to onemanga.com).

I sound so indifferent, I know. In fact, I AM. I don't know what has come over me. I have suddenly become a bit more contemplative when special days come. Lately, childhood memories have been flooding my mind. I have to write about them soon. It's a great opportunity for me to record my past.

Probably one thing that made me smile was a text message I received from a beloved teacher--- Prof. Aureus. It was such a big surprise for me. I thought that maybe he has forgotten about me. (Or maybe he did, just that he kept my number coz I sometimes ask him to translate something for me.) Anyway, since I do like him so very very much, it makes me feel good to be wished a Merry Christmas. And I replied to him--- in LATIN mind you! (I hope we get to meet again soon. I'd really love to converse with him in Latin.)

That's al for now. I'll be writing something important again. I keep forgetting about it but there's always tomorrow right? Still the procrastinator that I am. HMPH!


Dec 24, '09 1:25 PM
for Miracle's friends, Miracle's family and Miracle's online buddies

From Multiply 078: Best Week


December 14 (Monday): I attended the symposium on evolution held at the College of Science Auditorium with Rufus. I wasn't required to do so, just that when I happened to pass by the tarp the week before and seeing that my beloved idol Prof. Maria Serena Diokno would deliver a lecture, I just couldn't resist. Dr. Perry Ong was also there, as well as Prof. Michael Tan (I am an avid fan of his column in PDI), and of course, my super cool STS prof Sir Fidel Nemenzo, with his suave and sexy voice (as usual) and his superb summaries of the lectures. (I am so sorry to say this but I didn't listen to the Economics prof simply because I had great difficulty deciphering what he was saying and I couldn't quite follow his power point presentation.) SUPER KUDOS TO MA'AM DIOKNO who elicited howls of laughter from the audience with the ff. quote taken from a HS history textbook: Nanganganak ng aso ang aso; ang ibon ay ibon din; ang unggoy ay nanganganak ng unggoy. Kaya hindi maaaring magmula ang tao sa unggoy. She never disappoints. In fact, one gets to learn something new from her every time she's out in front to discuss something. Never mind the fact that she seems to be not very techie though she's got a neat Macbook.

First time ever to eat Long Island's pasta. I ordered anchovies and tuna. At P55, I don't think it's cheap with the small serving and wait, where is my tuna???

December 16 (Wednesday) Watched "Haikhikan '09" (a.k.a. Faculty Follies) with Louis. Ma'am Chei is so SEXY!!! Sir Manila's got such a nice body. Prof. Ramos was funny, he's so cute, acting like a zombie with a giraffe stuffed toy on his shoulder. I had fun watching the profs perform on stage. One thing I notice, though, is that they played "Nobody Nobody but You" countless times that even at home, that stupid song was playing inside my head. Worst case of LSS ever.

December 18 (Friday) Lantern Parade!!! I discovered a fruit shake stand near the Main Lib thanks to Nori-chan. Had two cups of carrot shake. (At P20, it's cheap and good!) Fooled around with Mimi's purple wig while people cast us weird glances haha!!! Such a good bonding time, not to mention a cool way to relax after all the heavy workload the previous weeks.

Ate a quick early dinner (actually snack LOL!) at a makeshift tent near the Carillon Tower. I had tipid meal #8 (P35 rice, pork BBQ, 1 pc. fried siomai). The BBQ was good, the siomai so NOT!

Had to run straight  to church afterwards. Good thing I arrived at exactly 8pm for teh Simbang Gabi.

Dec 20, '09 10:47 AM
for Miracle's friends, Miracle's family and Miracle's online buddies

From Multiply 077: Ecological consciousness


from: http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20091219-242858/Ecological-consciousness

By Randy David
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 02:30:00 12/19/2009

Filed Under: Climate Change, Environmental Issues
ECOLOGICAL CONSCIOUSNESS is the awareness that nearly every aspect of our way of life affects the environment so decisively that we now must choose whether to let the effects go unchecked, or we change the way we live in order to arrest the damage.

It is the growing awareness that the planet Earth is a finite place we share with other peoples—and indeed with all living creatures—and that if, by our ignorance and carelessness, we destroy it, we thereby also destroy ourselves.

The basic science we learn in grade school tends to lull us into a form of complacency that blinds us to ecological problems. My earliest recollection of carbon dioxide is that it is food that plants need, along with sunlight and water. The plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, and, in return, they give out the oxygen that humans need. Such, we are taught, is the wonderful self-regulating design of Nature.

Yet today we are told that this relationship between humans and their environment has not been going well at all. We are told that we have been releasing dangerous levels of greenhouse gases like CO2 into the atmosphere as a result of our furious effort to improve the conditions of human existence, and that this has led to global warming.

What seems obvious to scientists, however, is never always obvious to the rest of us. There is a reason for this. While the environment is directly affected by human activity, it does not have the capacity to directly “communicate” with humans.

Nature and man do not share a common language; humans hear messages from the environment only in their own human languages. On top of this, whatever messages the environment transmits are necessarily filtered by the multiple cultures and belief systems, and varying systems of cognition that characterize human societies.

Thus, natural phenomena like unusual rainfall levels, strong typhoons, rising seas, droughts, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, etc. are viewed in different lights and treated with varying degrees of concern by different societies. The responses they trigger are never the same. Indeed, even within the same society, these phenomena are not uniformly interpreted by the different institutional spheres of society.

Environmental issues do not have the same resonance in law, religion, the economy, and politics, as they often do in science. Not even the most modern society can be said to have a central nervous system that is specifically attuned to changes in environmental conditions, and can control societal response. Indeed, even in an advanced country like the United States, the politicians and businessmen differ with the scientists in their appreciation of the urgency of global warming.

In view of this, it is a wonder how anyone can imagine that the 193 nations meeting in Copenhagen for the UN-sponsored summit on global climate change could arrive at any agreement on the dimensions of the problem, its causes and solutions, or, much less, on what every nation must do, when, and by what means, in order to confront the problem. It does not require any sophistication to think that every definition of the problem of climate change, every piece of knowledge that is advanced, far from being objective, is implicated in a system of power.

This is not to deny the existence of the problem. But if global warming were the self-evident and objective phenomenon it is supposed to be, there would be little negotiation about its magnitude, origins, and the shape and direction of the requisite global response. There would be no need to call urgent attention to its gravity. But the poor and the rich countries meeting in Copenhagen precisely cannot agree on what every nation needs to do to check global warming, and who will pay for the adjustments that must be made, because there is no common understanding—and there never will be—of the sources, scale, and seriousness of the problem.

The United States blames China for being the biggest producer of carbon dioxide emissions since 2006. China counters that America remains the largest CO2 producer per capita and has been so since it became an industrial power. American scientists charge that massive deforestation occurring in the poor countries is releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere than all the combined vehicles and industrial plants in the world. Taking their cue from this, rich countries are offering money to help the poor countries stop deforestation. On the surface, this looks like an altruistic solution to a global problem. But critics have accused rich nations of trying to buy their way out of binding commitments to slash their own carbon emissions. Climate change is clearly not a simple scientific issue. It is embedded in political and economic questions, and is routinely used by countries as a proxy in the global struggle for political and economic supremacy.

Yet none of this diminishes the value of ecological consciousness. Indeed, it only highlights the need for every nation and every individual, as citizens of this planet, to examine their respective ways of life with a view to altering those practices that destroy the earth’s long-term viability as a place in which to live. The earth is a dying planet, but, alas, we cannot hear its gasping or recognize its morbid state except through the narrow bounds of our all-too-human sensibilities. There is no cure for this other than to allow the earth’s tears to flood our consciousness. Then, hopefully, we may see that the environment is not the other; it is us.

* * *
public.lives@gmail.com

Dec 20, '09 9:44 AM
for everyone

From Multiply 076: Simbang Gabi


Nagsimula kagabi ang Simbang Gabi na nakagawian na ng karamihan sa mga Katoliko sa Pilipinas. Isa itong tradisyon kung saan 9 na magkakasunod na gabi ay nagdaraos ng misa ang simbahan bilang paghahanda sa nalalapit na Araw ng Kapanganakan ng Tagapagligtas na si Hesukristo. Ngayong ikalawang gabi, mga alaala ng aking mga kaisipan sa aking kabataan ang pumuno sa aaking isipan.

Inaamin ko na hindi naman talaga ako tapat na Katoliko. Malaki nga ang impluwensiya ng Katolisismo sa akin, pagkat mula kabataan ay napaliligiran ako ng mga taong katoliko--- ang aking ina, mga kapatid at yaya ay pawang mga nananampalataya sa relihiyong ito. (Ang aking ama naman ay isang Buddhist pero hindi siya relihiyoso.) Naaalala ko pa noong bata pa ako, ang Bibliya ang unang importanteng libro na binabasa ko. (Siguro dahil na rin sa kakulangan ng libro sa aming tahanan kung kaya't naisipan kong buklatin ang kopya ng aking ina. Paboritong paborito ko noon ang Genesis at Revelations, iyong huli ay panakot sa sarili, mas nakakatakot pa sa mga pelikulang horror.) Naaalala ko rin ang kagustuhan kong maging pari dahil sobra akong nahatak ng Bibliya sa murang edad na 7 taon. Pero ang pangarap na iyon ay mananatiling ganoon lang--- isang pangarap. Nang malaman ko na hindi pala pwedeng magpari ang kababaihan, hindi talaga ako makapanilwala. Bakit naman lalaki lang ang pwede??? Bawal bang madre (ang akala ko dati, ang madre ay babaeng pari) ang magmisa?

Iyan ang unang tanong na sumagi sa aking isipan. Lumaki ako sa isang paamilyaang lubos ang pagpapahalaga sa mga lalaki habang mababa ang tingin sa babae. Nang malaman ko ang tungkol sa pagbabawal sa mga kababaihan na magmisa ay nagising ako sa hindi pantay na pagtingin sa 2 kasarian. Masakit pero iyan ang sabi ng simbahan. Tanggap ko na sana (karaniwan kasi ang pagtanggap na walang panunuri), kaso may nabasa akong tungkol sa isang profeta na babae, si Devorah o Deborah sa ibang versyon. Dito nagsimula ang pag-iisip ko kung tama ba ang turo ng Simbahang Katolika. (Mula pa dati ay hindi ko kinwestiyon kung maay Dios ba o wala dahil malinaw na malinaw sa akin na totoong may Diyos.)

Dahil dito, nagpasya akong maging isang misyonera na lamang. Isang independent na misyonera na walang koneksiyon sa mga katoliko pero ang aking magiging batayan ay ang Bibliya. Mahaba ang kwento pero paiikliin ko na lang. Nang lumawak ang kaalaman ko tungkol sa mundo, napaisip ako kung Kristiyanismo ba ang totoong relihiyon. Siguro sa karamihan oo, maganda kasi ang mga turo nito. Pero kung titingnan natin ang iba pang mga relihiyon, mabubuti rin ang turo nila. Ang tinutukoy ko ay ang mga kasulatan. Sa aking palagay, mga interpretasyon ng mga tao ang nagpagulo sa mga kasulatang ito. May mga motibo at may mga propagandang kahalo, at hindi binibigyan ng ganap na atensyon ang espirituwal na aspekto ng relihiyon na dapat ay pangunahing gawain nito. Bilang isang sanay sa indibidwalismo, napagpasyahan kong maging isang eklectica na walang kinikilingan. Kumbagaa, para na rin akong "lapsed Catholic". Madalas nga lang naapagkakamalan kong ateista, pero nililinaw ko dito na hindi ako ateista, ako'y naniniwala sa Diyos, hindi nga lang sa diyos ng kung anu-anong relihiyon. Kung baga, personal ang konsepto ko ng Diyos, at personal din ang aking pananampalataya.

Siyempre, nanatili sa akin ang karamihan sa mga turo ng Kristiyanismo. Naniniwala ako kay Hesukristo, kung itatanong ninyo. Pero hindi ako naniniwala na nakuha ng mga larawan at mga scultures ang totoong anyo Niya. Personal din ang pananampalataya ko sa kanya at iba sa mga Kristiyano.

Ano naman ang kinalaman ng mga ito sa Simbang Gabi?

Oo nagsisimba ako. Pero may mas malalim na dahilan kung bakit ako nagsisimba. Kung may isang magandang kontribusyon ang mga katoliko, ito'y sa arte, musika at arkitectura. Napakainteresante para sa akin ang iba't ibang itsura ng mga simbahan, ang pagkakatayo, mga nilalaman, paano ang interpretasyon sa mga eksenang nasa Bibliya, atbp. At gustong gusto ko ang efekto ng echo sa musikang eklesiastikal.


Dec 16, '09 11:04 AM
for Miracle's friends, Miracle's family and Miracle's online buddies